Ideas and comments from a unique perspective from the analyst who has already been there when TSHTF...twice.
Delicious collection of must-read silvertard articles.
email:strongman.shelford@gmail.com

lunes, 25 de noviembre de 2013

What Is Goldman Sachs Doing With Venezuela's Gold?


Gold bars
Are these Venezuela's gold bars? Probably not. But if you search Bloomberg's photo library for "gold bars" you get 24 pages of results. I don't know what to make of that. Source: World Gold Council via Bloomberg News.

What Is Goldman Sachs Doing With Venezuela's Gold?

A while back Greece had a problem. The problem was that it wanted to borrow more money, but didn't want to increase its debt. (Because the European Union would frown on it having more debt.) So it went to Goldman Sachs, and Goldman told Greece, well, what you can do is borrow some money from us, but we won't call it debt, because something something something something swaps.
This worked pretty well for everyone, for a while: Greece got the money, but nobody outside the deal understood that it had borrowed the money, because it was part of a derivative trade that was not accounted for as debt. Then it stopped working, and everyone got mad at Greece for disguising its debt, and at Goldman for helping Greece disguise its debt and charging rather
more:

martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013

Jim Rogers: "Own Gold" Because "One Day, Markets Will Stop Playing This Game"

Jim Rogers hope-driven wish is that the politicians were smart enough at some point to say (to the central bankers), "we've got to stop this, this is going to be bad." He adds, on the incoming QEeen, "she’s not going to stop it, first of all she doesn't believe in stopping it, she thinks printing money is good." However, Rogers warns in this excellent interview with Birch Gold, "eventually the markets will just say, "We're not going to play this game anymore", and we'll have a serious collapse." The world is blinded by central bank liquidity, and as Rogers somewhat mockingly notes "if everybody says the sky is blue, I urge you to look out the window and see if it's blue because I have found that most people won't even bother to look out the window..." Rogers concludes, "everybody should own some precious metals as an insurance policy," because as he ominously warns, when 'it' collapses, "there will be big change.



Transcript (via Birch Gold Group) 
Rachel Mills, Birch Gold Group (BGG): This is Rachel Mills for Birch Gold, and I am very pleased to be joined today by Jim Rogers, legendary investor. Thank you so much Jim for joining me.
Jim Rogers: I am delighted to be here Rachel.
BGG: So today I wanted to talk a little about stock market highs and Quantitative Easing and inflation and a little bit of Federal Reserve and when is the taper is going to happen and currency wars. But there is one question that I don’t have to ask you, which you get asked a lot, I know, and that is what your secret to being so prescient in the marketplace?
“…if everybody says the sky is blue, I at least urge you to go and look out the window and see if it’s blue because I have found that most people won’t even bother to look out the window…”
JR: As far as I know, I’m not quite sure. I do know that I have learned over the years, always, when nearly everybody is thinking the same way that means somebody’s not thinking that means we got to start thinking about it and see if there’s not another way, another approach. Because if everybody says the sky is blue, I at least urge you to go and look out the window and see if it’s blue because I have found that most people won’t even bother to look out the window. If they see on the television or in the newspaper or something that everybody says the sky is blue, I at least urge them to look out the window. I find that most people don’t want to do their homework, that’s the first problem that many people have, is just doing simple homework.
“…no matter what we all know today, it’s not going to be true in 10 or 15 years…”
Second, I have learned that if everybody says the sky is blue and I go and look out the window and see that it is blue, I have also learned that, well wait a minute, if everybody knows the sky is blue, is that going to change? Now that everybody knows something, is it time to start thinking about “Well maybe tomorrow the sky will not be blue?” And again, most people say “Well everybody knows the sky is blue and that’s all we need to know.” No, it’s not all you need to know because another thing I have learned in my life is that no matter what we all know today, it’s not going to be true in 10 or 15 years. You pick any year in history and go back and then look to see what everybody thought was true in that year, 15 years later the world had changed enormously. Enormously. And yet in that particular year everybody was convinced that this is the way the world was. Pick 1900, 1930, 1950, any year you want to pick, and you will see that 15 years later, the world was totally, totally different from what everybody thought it was at that time.
So I have learned, for whatever reason, to know that change is coming, to know to think against the crowd, that the crowd is nearly always wrong and to try to think for myself. Now, I certainly make plenty of mistakes and have made plenty of mistakes in my life, but these are some of the things that I have learned, to try to think around the corner, try to think to the future if you want to be successful.
BGG: Yeah that’s right. And I read somewhere, tell me if this is true, that you were shorting real estate in 2006?
JR: Yes, yes, 2006, 2007, 2008. Yes, yes. I was short Fannie Mae, I was short all of the investment banks. I was short all the banks.
BGG: And I bet, were people rolling their eyes at you, were they laughing at you?
rogers 1252603c 300x187 Exclusive Interview with Jim Rogers: QE, currency wars, gold and inflation
Photo: www.telegraph.co.uk
JR: Oh very much so. I went on television quite a lot in those days saying it’s crazy. And I was on CNBC and I explained that I was short Fannie Mae and had been short Fannie Mae and Fannie Mae finally started to collapse. And the lady said to me, “Well it’s your fault that Fannie Mae is going down, it’s the short sellers that are causing problems with Fannie Mae.” And I explained to her, “Listen lady, if you really think that short sellers are making Fannie Mae collapse, you better get another job, because that’s not the way the world works.” Short sellers do not make Fannie Mae go from $70 to $0, I assure you, the only thing that can make that happen is serious fundamental problems. So yes, everybody knew I was nuts back in those days!
And then, they started blaming it on me and on the short sellers, all of the problems. Nobody likes to take responsibility for their mistakes, certainly not politicians, but it was clear that first they laugh at you, then they ridicule you and say it’s your fault and blame it on you. Eventually they all say, “Oh, well we knew that. We thought of it ourselves! We knew that Fannie Mae was a fraud.” But that’s a difficult and sometimes painful process.
BGG: Sounds like they were attributing more power to you than you actually have!
JR: It’d be wonderful if all I had to do was sell something short and it would go down. Unfortunately it usually goes up when I sell it short, my timing is usually pretty wrong.
BGG: I want to talk a little bit about currencies. It seems that all the major countries in the world are in this race to the bottom to devalue their currency relative to all the others to appease their export industry. Meanwhile, workers and savers are getting killed by the cost of living increases that this is causing. Do you have any observations or predictions about how this currency war is going to end, or can it continue somehow indefinitely? And who wins in a currency race to the bottom?
“Eventually the markets will just say, ‘We’re not going to play this game anymore’, and we’ll have a serious collapse.”
JR: Well, the first thing you need to know is that nobody ever wins a trade war, a currency war, which is just another kind of trade war. Everybody loses in the end, some may temporarily come out ahead but it’s temporary if nothing else. As you have pointed out, the cost of living of many people is going up, and it certainly is, my gosh, in Japan you have a currency that’s down 25% in a year. Well I assure you the Japanese are feeling that because everything that Japan imports has gone up fairly substantially AND even the things that they don’t import are up because the Japanese manufacturers and the Japanese producers can raise prices because they don’t have to worry about competing with the foreigners any more.
“We’ve got to stop this, this is going to be bad.”
So we’re all losing in currency wars. How long can it go on? Well, it can go on as long as politicians can continue to print money. The problem is, of course, eventually the markets will just say, “We’re not going to play this game anymore” and we’ll have a serious collapse. You and I can print money all day long, but at some point, you, I and everybody else is going to say, “Wait a minute, guys, this money is getting worse and worse and more and more worthless, so why don’t we stop playing this game?” I wish the politicians were smart enough at some point to say, “We’ve got to stop this, this is going to be bad.”
But unfortunately they never have, and probably never will. Mr. Bernanke is certainly not going to stop it, because he doesn’t want to go down in history as causing the collapse. Mrs. Yellen, when she comes in, she’s not going to stop it, first of all she doesn’t believe in stopping it, she thinks printing money is good. And she knows – I hope she’s smart enough to know – that if she stops, oh my gosh, it’s going to collapse. So she’s not going to stop. Nobody wants to go down as causing the collapse of the world. So I’m afraid this is going to go on until the market eventually says to them, “Okay, enough is enough,” we have a big collapse and then they’re all thrown out and we can start over.
“Eventually they will try to cut [QE], it will finally cause the collapse, at that point we will have a big change, because they will throw them out, whether it’s the politicians or the central bankers or whoever.”
BGG: Wow, that’s a painful scenario actually. Do you think there is any chance that Larry Summers would have stopped Quantitative Easing at all?
JR: Well, first of all it’s irrelevant because he’s not going to be Federal Reserve Chairman. Second, even if he started, you know, if somebody came in and said, “Okay, we’ve got a terrible problem, we’ve made horrible mistakes, now let’s change things.” And even if everybody in the world said, “You know, he’s right, we’ve got to do something” and they started, well, within a few months or a year or two, the pain would be pretty horrible and then everybody’s going to say, “Well we didn’t know the pain was going to be this bad, this is not what we signed up for.” And then the guy would either be thrown out or assassinated or who knows what!
BGG: Oh yeah, they would blame everything on whoever stopped the party.
JR: Yeah. At first they say “It’s fine, we want to do it”, but once the pain comes, the pain is going to get pretty serious. We had Mr. Volcker who came in, was told “stop the madness” back in the 1970s and he did. Well, Jimmy Carter got thrown out, because he was who had told him to do that, because the pain was so bad. Reagan of course thought it was wonderful, that pain was taking place because that got him elected. And it was help to clean up the problems. That’s what happens, you cause the pain and they throw you out.
BGG: So, you don’t think there is any way they’re gonna make good on their threats or promises to taper?
Rogers S 640x360 300x168 Exclusive Interview with Jim Rogers: QE, currency wars, gold and inflation
Photo: www.jimrogersinvestments.com
JR: They might, no I don’t. They might start, as I said, somewhere along the line they’re going to start doing it. But when the pain gets pretty serious, the lady or the person or whoever it is, is going to have real problems. Let’s say that in 2015, Yellen says, “We’ve got to stop this” and they start stopping it, well, at that point it’s going to be pretty serious for the parties in power and they’re going to get thrown out and the next guys will continue to taper because, as I’ve said, they got power because of the tapering and the problems, and they’ll clean up the problems.
But that’s the only way that you’re going to see it stop someday. The market is just going to say, “We don’t want to play.” That’s what happened with Jimmy Carter when he was in, everything was collapsing: bond yields were falling apart, you know, inflation was everywhere. “Thank you Mr. Carter, we don’t want to play this game anymore. It’s absurd.”
BGG: What tip-offs are you looking for for where the top of the market is and when would you start to see the collapse coming? Are there signs that you’re looking for?
JR: Well, I wish I was that smart or it was that easy. Back in the late 1970s, Mr. Volcker was told and he came in and said: “I am going to kill inflation because Mr. Carter has told me to.” And Mr. Carter was very clear that he had to stop inflation. I doubt if we’ll have that kind of scenario again but we would think, we would hope, that the Federal Reserve will announce, you know, that they publish their numbers so we can all see what’s happening. At the moment they are buying a trillion dollars a year – that’s a trillion with a “T” – of assets. Eventually we will see that they stop that if they do or slow it down.
What will probably happen is that they will slow it down at first to see what happens, and if things aren’t too bad at first – and they probably won’t be too bad at first – well what is likely to happen is they will slow it down, things will drop, and then they will rally and the Federal Reserve will say “Hey, this is not so bad, we can do it.” And they’ll cut some more. Things will drop again and then rally, because it will take a while for people to really believe how bad it can get, or will get. And so eventually they will try to cut [QE], it will finally cause the collapse, at that point we will have a big change, because they will throw them out, whether it’s the politicians or the central bankers or whoever … will continue because they like it, they got the job because of the collapse and then we’ll finally start over. But it may be really painful in the meantime.
“I’ve owned gold for many years, I’ve never sold any gold and I can’t imagine I ever will sell gold in my life because it is somewhat of an insurance policy.”
BGG: Sure. And when we do begin the process of starting over, whenever that happens, it will be really good to have something substantial, something real, something other than paper in your portfolio. And that’s what Birch Gold is trying to help people figuring out how to do. So, we’ve always said that precious metals are a type of insurance for the long term. I read in your interview in Barrons that you are holding gold right now and expecting maybe a buying opportunity to come up. Do you still feel that way?
JR: Yes, I’ve owned gold for many years, I’ve never sold any gold and I can’t imagine I ever will sell gold in my life because it is somewhat of an insurance policy. I hope that my daughters own my gold someday, I mean I owned gold, I’ve never sold any gold and if gold comes down and I expect it to go down, doesn’t mean it will, I’ll buy more. I’m certainly not going to sell.
“Everybody should own some precious metals as an insurance policy. So if they don’t have any right now, I would urge them to go buy something.”
BGG: Right. So what advice would you give someone who as of yet has no precious metals in their portfolio right now?
JR: Well, everybody should own some precious metals as an insurance policy. So if they don’t have any right now, I would urge them to go buy something, buy themselves a gold coin if nothing else, and see that it’s not going to hurt. It won’t hurt you to buy the first gold coin, the first silver coin, and from that you start accumulating as your own situation dictates.
First, do your homework, don’t buy gold because you heard me say it or even because you hear you say it. But if people don’t own they should start after they have done their homework. And then they will probably, if they do their homework, most people will then realize, “Oh my gosh, I better have insurance, and gold and silver may get me through serious problems ahead.”
BGG: Yeah. How do you feel about silver? Do you favor silver over gold? How do you feel?
JR: Well, silver is historically down 60% from its all-time highs, so yes, I would prefer silver at the moment because gold is down only what, 30 or 40% from its all-time highs.
BGG: Well, thank you so much for talking with me today. I think we will leave it there. Thank you so much, Jim Rogers.
JR: Thank you Rachel, anytime. Let’s do it again.
BGG: I would love to.
JR: Bye bye.
BGG : Bye, thank you!

martes, 12 de noviembre de 2013

Federal Reserve Whistleblower Tells America The REAL Reason For Quantitative Easing

A banker named Andrew Huszar that helped manage the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program during 2009 and 2010 is publicly apologizing for what he has done.  He says that quantitative easing has accomplished next to nothing for the average person on the street.  Instead, he says that it has been “the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time.”  And of course the cold, hard economic numbers support what Huszar is saying.  The percentage of working age Americans with a jobhas not improved at all during the quantitative easing era, and median household income has actually steadily declined during that time frame.  Meanwhile, U.S. stock prices have doubled overall, and the stock prices of the big Wall Street banks have tripled.  So who benefits from quantitative easing?  It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out, and now Andrew Huszar is blowing the whistle on the whole thing.

From 2009 to 2010, Huszar was responsible for managing the Fed’s purchase of approximately $1.25 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities.  At the time, he thought that it was a dream job, but now he isapologizing to the rest of the country for what happened…

Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/federal-reserve-whistleblower-tells-america-the-real-reason-for-quantitative-easing/#Mz55Qv2lduRojcfv.99

martes, 5 de noviembre de 2013

Silver Could be Explosive! Vanessa Collette interviews Bill Murphy at the 11th Annual Silver Summit

2 very "interesting" people. Bill Murphy  (interesting gold guy) and Vanessa Collete (very interesting...interviewer!)

check the inteview, silvertards:

strongman out:

Silver Could be Explosive! Vanessa Collette interviews Bill Murphy at the 11th Annual Silver Summit

 |
October 30, 2013 - 7:51pm
http://67.19.64.18/news/2013/9-10gs/1.jpg
By: Vanessa Collette, GoldSeek.com TV
Taped on-location in Spokane, Washington at the 2013 Silver Summit (October 25, 2013)

15 years of facts add up to same thing: gold manipulation!

Bill Murphy, chairman of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, sits down for a powerful one-on-one with Cambridge House Live's Vanessa Collette at Silver Summit 2013 in Spokane, Washington. She presses hard for examples of gold manipulation and he lays out credible evidence any investor would be interested in knowing about.
Vanessa Collette: Welcome to Cambridge House Live. I’m here at the 11th Annual Silver Summit in Spokane, Washington. I’m here with Bill Murphy, Chairman of the Gold Anti Trust Action Committee and a financial commentator on LeMetropoleCafé.com – welcome David, great to have you here with us again.
Bill Murphy: Good to see you again.
VC: Bill, what’s happening with the gold price today?
BM: Well today it’s flat and of course one of the things that GATA always gets into – we talk about the gold cartel – they never allow any action on the upside. You have a big day – next day nothing... Big day- next day nothing [laughs], another big day – especially in the past week, nothing. And this is what they do – they don’t allow any excitement and today’s just typical of the way they operate. Once you have a really good day, and people are really looking to go, they never allow it to go like any other market, to keep going. So today is a perfect example [referring to October 25, 2013].
VC:  And why is that? Why are they controlling it so tightly?
BM: Well basically, as I mentioned, it’s really to keep excitement from building in the market. And a good way to follow it is the more bullish the news a lot of times in the gold market, you’ll see it maybe go up for a little bit.. and then it tanks. They have certain ways that they attack the market, whether it’s these flash crash attacks that have been happening, you know, for the last 6 months and so on, and certain things that we follow on my website, and just document how they operate, and manipulate the market.
VC: So you mentioned the ‘flash crashes’, what are some of the other ways that they intervene with the gold price?
BM: Well, one of the times that many people remember was in mid-April last year, when 100 tons hit the market in 10 minutes, but no one was around, and then on a Friday afternoon, another 100 tons hit the market or something like that, I think it was a total of over 200 tons, in a matter of minutes. And the gold price just COLLAPSED, it was what I call, a terrorist attack, it was the same thing, it had the same effect, no other market trades like this, nobody ever seems to explain, how come it’s gold and silver that trades like this on the downside, where you can document it, what’s happened. What we don’t understand is why the CFTC doesn’t just do time and sales and say who did the trades? And is this a pattern? IS it a concentrated attack, is it against the law, it’s not Einstein stuff, all they have to do is check the records.
VC: Now Bill, every time the price moves up and down, do you always attribute it to manipulation? Or how do we know when there’s actually natural price movements’ happening?
BM: Well that’s a good question, because a lot of people might say, well every time it goes down, it’s the gold cartel, and when it goes up, it’s not – and that’s a fair thing to say. [laughs] But the irony is, a lot of times, because gold is probably priced at half of what it should be, a lot of the time it’s their instigation. For example they’ll stop it at 3 AM New York time. They’ve done that oh – 10 out of 12 days in a recent during period, where they would start it down. Or what happens is – they’ll hit the markets, and then they get everyone else to sell, and maybe they can cover. So they’re there and we document all the time, a great deal of it. Of course it’s not always them, but they do more than their share of stopping the market and that’s why gold is so undervalued today.
VC: I’ve seen you say many times that ‘no market operates like this.’ Can you clarify what you mean by that?
BM: Yes, what other market trades like gold has – whether It’s no follow through, whether it’s flash crash attacks, whether it’s counter intuitive. Perfect example is, the quantitative easing we’ve had in the past year. All other markets did what you’d expect – the stock market went up, the oil price went up, the euro went up, Japan did quantitative easing last year, their currency collapsed. But gold and silver instead of going up since last early October, about a year ago, instead of going up like everything else, the Dow goes up every day like this, the NASDAQ keeps going up and up and up – gold and silver [makes thumbs downward motion with hands] it’s so counter –intuitive. Why don’t people just use common sense? And say, look, there’s a dichotomy here – what’s going on? GATA explains it, that’s what we do.
VC:  Now Bill, you’ve mentioned that the gold cabal, according to you, is running out of physical supply to distort the market. Why do you think that and what will happen if they do run out of gold supplies – what will it mean for precious metals?
DM: Well, as far as we’re concerned that’s the key to the market. You know, they can’t just attack it in the paper market, and the futures market, they’ve got to use physical gold, physical silver to meet demand. Every day there’s a PM fix in London which 90% of the business is priced on a daily basis – so it’s not phantom, just paper trades, they have to use supply and we believe – whether it’s gold for example, people are having a hard time explaining China almost taking up all of the gold supply produced over a year period – why isn’t the price going way up, why is it getting killed? Well, we believe it’s coming from Central Banks, surreptitiously hitting the market, to get the price down. And at some point they’re just going to run out of it, all they can do to keep it there. It happened in 2001 when the price was at $300. GATA determined that they were using Central Bank Gold, which was not being disclosed, and they wouldn’t be able to keep it down there, there was too much demand, that’s what is going to happen again here, and we think it’s going to set off much higher prices over the next year, next month’s even.
VC: So you are extremely bullish right now – on the coming price movement in gold that you see happening.
BM: I think so, you know were at the Silver Summit, and I think the same thing is true in Silver – I think that they borrowed supply from the future. Last year for example, there was all kind of premiums, and nobody could explain it. I mean it looked like the market at $32 was going to take off, and everyone was reporting the same thing. I have a theory that – it’s just a theory- that [JP] Morgan went out and tied up all the supply, created the premiums, and then we heavily short by buying puts in the futures market, loaded up on the shorts side this year, beginning of this year, dropped the price from $35 to $32 and then went down to $18. I think that supply has been used up. And it’s just a guess but I think that the real surprise this year is that gold and silver, and especially silver, explodes out of nowhere.
VC: Speaking of Silver, the CFTC just closed a long drawn out investigation into silver. What happened there?
BM: Well, from GATA’s standpoint, we’ve been citing JP Morgan for years as the major culprit, everyone knows that they’d been the major short, and there was evidence provided against them to the CFTC and what they were doing in advance. Basically, the long story short, JP Morgan, the justice department is investigating JP Morgan in six different areas. Now, all of a sudden they stop the silver investigation – so almost the only thing they are not going after Morgan for is SILVER. What we think happened is that they did the investigation and they found out that one of the people behind it is the US government – it’s their own boss. So what are you going to do? An in terms of the exchange stabilization fund is allowed to do this and work in secret and only report to the Treasury and to the President on what they are doing, Now this is on the Treasury website, GATA is not making this up, they can do it in secret, and we believe that is what they have been doing, in conjunction with Morgan and some other people, and that’s what the investigation showed. Now what are you going to do? Go after your own boss? [laughs]
VC: So you think that they missed anything?
BM: No I think that they just found out that it was the US government and they just said, that they’re allowed to do this in secret, as per the exchange stabilization fund, which is stated on their own website, and so, what are they going to do?
VC: Bill, is there anything that could convince you that there wasn’t any manipulation or intervention happening in the precious metals prices? I know a lot of people have maybe attempted to convince you.
BM: Well, we’ve been doing it for 15 years, and as my colleague Chris Powell says, we are a fact finding organization. We’ve put 15 years’ worth of facts that all add up to the same thing. And even if people don’t want to believe GATA, I mean we are going up against the richest, most powerful people in the world. We know what we’re up against. It all comes down to the same thing – just common sense of what gold and silver have been doing this year compared to all other markets. And if you just did that you would think – something is not right here. And GATA has identified what’s not right.
VC: So Bill, what do you think the real price of gold and silver should be, today?
BM: Well it’s interesting, a couple of years ago, you heard a lot of people saying that if gold had kept up with inflation, it would have been $2,500/oz. That was a couple of years ago, for some reason nobody is talking about that anymore. But basically it suggests that gold is at about half of where it should be today, if it just had kept up with inflation. Not taking into account all of the quantitative easing and everything else that’s going on.
VC: So do you have a specific number in mind?
BM: Yeah, it would be about $2,500-2,600 right now. Now Silver, was up to $50 just a couple of years ago, and there was a lot of conjecture why it got there. I’m a big fan of Eric Sprotts, and Eric thinks that silver is going to $100, at least. And I think Eric’s going to be right in the next year or too.
VC: When I interviewed him recently, he said $2,400 gold by next year.
BM: Go Eric!
VC: Now, do you see many people coming around to your perspective? How hard is it for you to convince people?
BC. Well, it was like pulling teeth, and now it’s like pulling less teeth. But with all that’s happened, especially with these flash crash, waterfall attacks, more people are starting to come around our way. You’re seeing a lot more talk about it, at least on the internet. The mainstream media still won’t allow GATA to be mentioned although Bernie Lowe was gracious and had Chris Powell on over in Hong Kong, Bernie is a great guy. But basically the truth is not allowed to be told, and that’s really scary. Even if you disagree with GATA, we’ve earned the right with all we’ve done and all of the conferences we’ve had, to be heard. And certainly the people who have spoken at our conferences are some of the biggest names in the business and some of the classiest people.
VC: Just allow the dialogue to occur.
BM: Allow the dialogue- just like this!
VC: Now Bill, you think the cabal is going after long term metal holders now, what is the strategy there?
BM: Well, what we can say is the fact that gold, as a result of their attacks, and collapsing $500, big investors, pensions funds, and so on, people that have been investing in the gold ETFs, have all been selling and dumping it like 6-700 tons of gold. Well the bad guys, as we would call them, knew exactly what they were doing, as the price cratered down. Now why? Because it’s especially tough now because money managers have to compete against rising stock markets, other investments that are all doing well – gold and silver are getting killed so their relative performance stinks! So because they all work in synch on things, they are being forced to sell, and that’s exactly that the gold cartel expected and we believe, and other people have talked about this, gold is being taken from them and put in the market place or being shipped over to Asia and elsewhere.
VC: Bill we have a question from one of our viewers, from Eddie Drysdale, he’s COMEX in danger of running out of inventory, and if it does, could we see a crash in the gold ETF?
BM: Well, the gold ETF is a bit different from the COMEX inventory. What we can say is that COMEX inventories have really been drawn down. And what we believe the key to gold taking off again is the physical market over-powering the ability of the gold cartel to do what they are doing. And I think with the negative interest rates we are seeing, with inventories disappearing, China taking up all the gold, they’re going to hit the wall sometime in the not too distant future, and that is what is going to fuel the price of gold higher, and silver could be explosive, because they’ve borrowed from future supply, used it, and it’s all of a sudden not going to be there.
VC:  Bill Murphy, live at the Silver Summit. Silver could be explosive, it was great having you here with us today, and we look forward to having you back again soon.
BM: Vanessa, it’s my pleasure, thank you, it was great.


viernes, 1 de noviembre de 2013

India forced to take its eyes off gold

Gold demand typically peaks around now as Indian consumers load up on gold ahead of Diwali.
In response, gold shares on average have gained 2 percent one week ahead of the holiday. But we aren't seeing that big move in gold this year. Shares of the metal are down 1.4 percent this week, ahead of Diwali, which is being celebrated Nov. 3. 
Analysts and gold gurus are predicting that demand in India will be weaker this year as consumers battle a slowing economy, rising inflation and a depreciating rupee.
"You can bet that with the current state of the economy, Indians will be buying less gold and looking for alternative gifting options this Diwali season," says Arvind Panagariya, professor of economics at Columbia University and India observer.
No gold bump for Diwali?
CNBC's Seema Mody explains why gold's recent decline may have to do with India's rupee.
So if Indians aren't buying gold, what are they buying?
According to the local merchants in New Delhi and Mumbai—silver. It might not carry the same prestige and status, but it is cheaper and thus a good alternative. Silver shares trade at $22 an ounce, while gold shares are trading north of $1,300.
Merchants are seeing strong demand this season for silver coins, up about 10 percent to 15 percent year-over-year, according to BNP Paribas Securities in India.
BNP in India Executive Director Neil Nathwani said that with the economic slowdown, sales of dried fruits have surged.
"Some retailers of such products have seen sales grow by over 45 percent this year."
But silver and dried fruits won't be able to replace gold's important role in weddings, religious events and festivals.
That's why some experts say that regardless of economic conditions, India will always have a strong affinity for the yellow metal.
Somasundaram PR, managing director, India, for the World Gold Council, said that people there buy gold as a long-term investment to protect their wealth and that gold has social and emotional significance.
"Demand for gold, whether in the form of jewelry or investment [bars and coins], is predominantly retail—driven by millions of individuals across rural and urban India investing as part of their household savings ... not discretionary spending for consumption," PR said.
Demand just might not be as strong this holiday season.
—By CNBC's Seema Mody; Follow her on Twitter: 

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101163824

Donate 1 U$S to the good ole Strongman!. Thanks! goldmoney donations also accepted!