*Pro-gold propaganda boys were wrong (
because of previous comments with him) and gold price action was about to move
lower with NFP data on Friday 5, 2015 ( it happened exactly that way . They pushed gold with NFP data).
*My worries about the german bunds
run
* My questions to Chris Powell if the European central banks could sell their gold
reserves if a new crisis emerges.
Here are both emails with my questions and his replies:
Me: As I told
you, the permabullish gold propaganda failed easily.
They have a
very interesting modus operandi. They stopped gold around 1200$. you can
measure their movements and their hand when volatility is destroyed in intraday
max- min distance of the gold Price.
Then they
acommodated gold around a very psychological damaging área around 1180$ for
technical traders.
And now they
Use unemployment claims to break it at 8:30 Am NY.
But some
insiders pushed it below 1180$ yesterday big hand, and it was quickly cover and
hid in the charts by the supercomputers.
A very
classic modus operandi. Everything is ready and the psychological damage
is done today , weakening the masses for the final chapter: NFP data tomorrow
at 8:30 NY. So they moved this way.
As a GATA
supporter, I don´t like those permabulls guys who don´t see it coming.
They have the gold.
I would like
ask you this. WE have a bond run in Germany these days.
They have
lots of gold reserves. I believe around 2000 tons in Europe. If things get
nasty, will the European Unión sell its gold reserves to cover losses? IF that
is the case, gold is doomed. Venezuela had to sell it to Goldman Sachs.
I wonder if
you can tell me if there are some restrictions for gold sales for Europe. You
are a veteran and I am sure you may know this.
Thank you
very much. You are my gold mentor by email.
Chris Powell
reply:
Thanks for your note. But I see far more
gold-bearish propaganda than gold-bullish propaganda, as the former dominates
the mainstream financial news media, which is pervasive, while the latter
propaganda comes only from the tiny sector of gold bugs, to whom little
attention is paid.
I don't think central banks need to sell their
gold reserves to cover bond losses or ANY losses. They can cover losses
effortlessly just by creating money or, if something more substantial than that
is needed, by revaluing gold upward.
After all, gold is, as Assistant Undersecretary
of State Thomas O. Enders told Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in April
1974, "the reserve-creating instrument," the monetary instrument the
U.S. government considered decisive then --
-- and likely still considers decisive, or else
central banks wouldn't be trading in the gold market every day:
http://www.gata.org/node/12717I suppose the European Central Bank's Washington Agreement on Gold and its latest manifestation --
-- remains in force, purporting to limit gold
sales and leasing by its member central banks. But of course the ECB can meet
secretly and change its policy at any time, with or without an announcement, so
it is no guarantee to anyone else.
cp
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
So you see
, Chris Powell , one of the true veterans of gold manipulation history , believes that
if things get nasty in Europe, they won`t sell their gold reserves. But most
likely, they will revalue gold and print money to solve the crisis. His historical links are a delicious
explanation that top officials consider gold as a “reserve-creating asset” and that they will keep gold because they would prefer printing money
rather than giving gold away in a crisis.
To support GATA, visit GATA.ORG
Strongman Shelford
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario